Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;11:9429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88831-2

Table 3.

The discrimination performance of models in the training and testing datasets.

Model Cutoff Training dataset Testing dataset P value
AUC (95% CI lower–upper) SPE SEN ACC AUC (95% CI lower–upper) SPE SEN ACC
T2WI score − 0.768 0.769 (0.639–0.900) 0.659 0.810 0.708 0.758 (0.569–0.946) 0.759 0.800 0.759 0.922
DWI score − 0.578 0.634 (0.483–0.785) 0.886 0.789 0.723 0.653 (0.440–0.866) 0.789 0.200 0.586 0.890
CT score − 0.713 0.874 (0.777–0.972) 0.773 0.857 0.800 0.821 (0.650–0.993) 0.947 0.600 0.828 0.598
MR score − 0.555 0.788 (0.664–0.912) 0.795 0.714 0.769 0.805 (0.635–0.976) 0.789 0.600 0.724 0.872
Integrated score − 0.656 0.903 (0.828–0.977) 0.864 0.810 0.846 0.889 (0.770–1.000) 0.895 0.500 0.759 0.856
Concise score − 1.254 0.906 (0.833–0.979) 0.773 0.905 0.815 0.884 (0.761–1.000) 0.895 0.600 0.793 0.768

When the model value lesser than the corresponding cut-off value means perineural invasion status is negative; AUC the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, 95% CI lower–upper the lower value to the upper value of 95% confidence interval, SPE specificity, SEN sensitivity, ACC accuracy; P value was derived from Delong test between the training and testing datasets.