Table 3.
Response | Explanatory | Df | F value | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Genera | Landuse | 1 | 5.81 | 0.018 |
Season | 3 | 5.42 | 0.002 | |
Method | 1 | 184.00 | <0.001 | |
Landuse:Method | 1 | 31.06 | <0.001 | |
Season:Method | 3 | 4.09 | 0.009 | |
Chironomidae | Landuse | 1 | 3.51 | 0.064 |
Season | 3 | 5.79 | 0.001 | |
Method | 1 | 38.29 | <0.001 | |
Landuse:Method | 1 | 39.43 | <0.001 | |
EPT | Landuse | 1 | 8.60 | 0.004 |
Season | 3 | 19.98 | <0.001 | |
Method | 1 | 422.00 | <0.001 | |
Landuse:Method | 1 | 13.56 | <0.001 | |
Season:Method | 3 | 17.04 | <0.001 | |
Function | Landuse | 1 | 10.40 | 0.001 |
Season | 3 | 12.35 | <0.001 | |
Method | 1 | 431.53 | <0.001 | |
Group | 2 | 127.09 | <0.001 | |
Landuse:Method | 1 | 104.27 | <0.001 | |
Season:Method | 3 | 9.15 | <0.001 | |
Method:Group | 2 | 50.18 | <0.001 |
Results include each modeled genera, Chironomidae, EPT and functional richness response variable (N = 112), tested against the set of explanatory variables; including landuse type, method (eDNA/traditional), season and the possible two-way interactions. The model includes a pairwise distance variance structure to account for spatial autocorrelation. Models shown are the most parsimonious models with the associated model metrics, including degrees of freedom (DF), f-value and p-value, given for each set of response and explanatory variables. P-values in bold indicate significant effects.