Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 11;136(2):219–227. doi: 10.1177/0033354920969179

Table 1.

HCV screening outcomes by cohort at an urban safety-net health system in Chicago, Illinois, February 1, 2017–January 31, 2019a

Screening outcome Total Cohortb (n = 6597) Noncohortc (n = 14 421) P value
Tests
 HCV antibody tests 21 018 6597/21 018 (31%) 14421/21 018 (69%) <.001d
 Positive test result for HCV antibody 1318 874/1318 (66%) 444/1318 (34%) <.001d
 Positive test results for HCV antibody with sample reflexed for RNA teste 1293 857 (—) 436 (—)
 Positive result for HCV RNA 878 599/878 (68%) 279/878 (32%) <.001d
Positivity rates
 Anti-HCV positivityf 1318/21 018 (6%) 874/6597 (13%) 444/14 421 (3%) <.001g
 RNA anti-HCV positivityh 878/1293 (68%) 599/857 (70%) 279/436 (64%) .04g
 RNA positivityi 878/21 018 (4%) 599/6597 (9%) 279/14 421 (2%) <.001g

Abbreviations: —, does not apply; anti-HCV, HCV antibody; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

aData collected from health system records.

bPeople born during 1945-1965.

cPeople born outside the cohort.

dOne-sample t test of proportions for difference between cohort and noncohort; P < .05 considered significant.

eTwenty-five samples insufficient for reflex to detect HCV RNA.

fNumber of positive HCV antibody test results divided by number of HCV antibody tests.

gPearson χ2 test of independence for difference between cohort and noncohort; P < .05 considered significant.

hNumber of positive RNA test results divided by number of positive HCV antibody test results with sample reflexed for HCV RNA.

iNumber of positive RNA test results divided by total number of HCV antibody tests.