Table 4.
Factor | Hospital-implemented initiative | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Social determinants | Emergency department services | Policy advocacy | Community coalition | |
Hospital characteristics | ||||
Hospital belongs to a health care system | ||||
Yes | 2.39 (0.82-6.97) | 0.69 (0.38-1.27) | 1.86 (0.50-6.95) | 1.10 (0.66-1.81) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Hospital is a teaching hospital | ||||
Yes | 1.80 (0.29-10.97) | 0.79 (0.26-2.43) | 1.29 (0.26-6.39) | 0.75 (0.26-2.18) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
No. of beds at hospital | ||||
<50 | 4.30 (0.60-30.58) | 0.58 (0.20-1.68) | 0.27 (0.05-1.56) | 1.51 (0.60-3.8) |
50-199 | 2.05 (0.33-12.71) | 0.73 (0.29-1.85) | 0.16 (0.03-0.82)b | 1.90 (0.82-4.37) |
200-399 | 4.52 (0.77-26.56) | 0.73 (0.28-1.89) | 0.63 (0.16-2.43) | 1.16 (0.48-2.77) |
≥400 | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
County characteristics | ||||
Rural location | ||||
Yes | 1.72 (0.56-5.23) | 1.32 (0.66-2.66) | 1.95 (0.50-7.57) | 1.21 (0.70-2.09) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Percentage <138% federal poverty level | ||||
Yes | 0.95 (0.90-1.02) | 1.00 (0.96-1.04) | 0.98 (0.91-1.06) | 0.99 (0.96-1.02) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
State policiesc | ||||
Medicaid expansion | ||||
Yes | 4.75 (0.88-25.67) | 1.08 (0.48-2.44) | 1.40 (0.33-5.92) | 0.94 (0.51-1.73) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Targeted risk education | ||||
Yes | 0.86 (0.33-2.27) | 1.09 (0.58-2.05) | 0.58 (0.20-1.75) | 1.11 (0.68-1.82) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Provider education | ||||
Yes | 0.49 (0.17-1.43) | 1.03 (0.52-2.03) | 2.53 (0.59-10.78) | 1.03 (0.60-1.76) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
MAT funding | ||||
Yes | 2.87 (0.85-9.75) | 1.16 (0.50-2.68) | 0.79 (0.21-3.03) | 0.75 (0.40-1.42) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Naloxone access | ||||
Yes | 1.85 (0.53-6.43) | 1.57 (0.69-3.60) | 1.41 (0.36-5.48) | 1.48 (0.79-2.76) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
PDMP reporting | ||||
Yes | 0.37 (0.11-1.33) | 2.03 (1.00-4.12) | 1.01 (0.28-3.59) | 1.66 (0.96-2.87) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Pain management regulations | ||||
Yes | 1.09 (0.27-4.46) | 0.34 (0.15-0.79)b | 1.69 (0.40-7.19) | 0.62 (0.32-1.18) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Prescriber guidelines | ||||
Yes | 2.48 (0.77-7.97) | 1.76 (0.90-3.44) | 1.42 (0.42-4.79) | 0.91 (0.54-1.53) |
No | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
Abbreviations: MAT, medication-assisted treatment; PDMP, prescription drug monitoring program.
aSample was drawn from a 20% random sample of all US nonprofit hospitals (n = 2715) in each state using the American Hospital Association’s 2015 Annual Survey database.24 All values are odds ratio (95% CI). Data on the other 5 hospital initiatives are presented in Table 3.
bSignificant at P < .05 using a 2-tailed Wald χ2 test.
cList of 7 state policies was developed by Wickramatilake and colleagues26; Medicaid expansion was added by the authors.