TABLE 5.

Performance comparisons of iAMP-RAAC and RF (Chung et al., 2019) on training set in DS2 in the seven different AMP functional activities based on 10-fold cross-validation.

Activity	Method	SN (%)	SP (%)	ACC (%)	MCC (%)
Anti-parasitic	iAMP-RAAC	50.00	96.43	88.69	54.65
	RF	75.26	83.66	82.02	49.55
Anti-viral	iAMP-RAAC	88.21	94.70	92.34	83.41
	RF	91.09	93.24	92.47	83.82
Anti-cancer	iAMP-RAAC	52.12	97.99	90.34	61.19
	RF	76.73	78.88	78.55	45.07
Targeting mammals	iAMP-RAAC	69.72	96.93	92.40	71.20
	RF	86.77	88.93	88.53	66.20
Anti-fungal	iAMP-RAAC	91.27	78.58	86.23	71.04
	RF	85.73	85.53	85.65	70.50
TGPB	iAMP-RAAC	89.90	88.61	89.31	78.51
	RF	88.52	88.48	88.51	76.87
TGNB	iAMP-RAAC	90.58	87.83	89.32	78.50
	RF	88.05	88.15	88.09	76.06