Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;175(7):1–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0417

Table 2. Analysis of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measured by Laps on Multistage 20-m Shuttle Run Test.

Model Follow-up, mo Total No. (No. in intervention) No. of laps (95% CI)
Change from baseline, control Change from baseline, intervention Adjusted difference between intervention and control in 20-m shuttle test laps
Main analysisa: controlling for schools' remoteness and Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage score 12 993 (440) 2.11 (1.38-2.85) 3.32 (2.44-4.2) 1.20 (0.17-2.24)
24 864 (375) 4.42 (3.41-5.43) 6.64 (5.3-7.98) 2.22 (0.89-3.55)
Sensitivity analysis 1b: model without controlling for schools' remoteness or Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage score 12 993 (440) 1.74 (1.17-2.31) 2.75 (2.1-3.4) 1.01 (0.14-1.88)
24 864 (375) 3.63 (2.92-4.34) 5.5 (4.61-6.4) 1.87 (0.73-3.02)
Sensitivity analysis 2a: model controlling for schools' urban status and Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage score and imputing missing data 12 1021 (459) 2.01 (1.27-2.76) 3.36 (2.46-4.26) 1.35 (0.27-2.43)
24 970 (408) 4.56 (3.53-5.59) 7.22 (5.8-8.65) 2.66 (1.23-4.08)
a

Main analysis = mixed effect model with a Poisson link function. ICC student = 0.86, ICC teacher = 0.06, ICC School = 0.04.

b

Sensitivity analyses 2 a and b included imputation for students who were absent during a primary outcome assessment, but provided other assessment data at that time point. The median absolute deviation in shuttle runs for the control group was 8 laps (at baseline). The intervention effect size was equivalent to 15% of the median absolute deviation at 12 months and 28% of the median absolute deviation at 24 months.