Ohtsuka 2014.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multi‐centre study in Japan Number of control centres: not reported Country/Location: Japan 2 treatment arms: 1 rufinamide; 1 placebo |
|
Participants | Participants: people aged 4 to 30 years with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome Gender: 62% males (rufinamide group 60.7%; placebo group 63.3%) Mean age (years): 15 (rufinamide group 16.0; placebo group 13.9) Mean weight (kg): 34.7 (rufinamide group 39.0; placebo group 40.9) Ethnic groups: not reported Median number of seizures: rufinamide group 253; placebo group 296.7 Duration of epilepsy (years): 9.9 (rufinamide group 10.5; placebo group 9.3 years) Inclusion criteria: aged 4 to 30 years, weighing ≥ 15 kg with established Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome Exclusion criteria: people with experienced tonic‐clonic status epilepticus during baseline period; those with other clinically severe diseases or ECG/laboratory abnormalities Diagnostic criteria: Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome diagnosed based on history of tonic or atonic (or both) seizures and atypical absence seizures and slow spike‐and‐wave complex patterns on EEG within 6 months before the baseline period Comorbidities: none Comedications: ≤ 3 AEDs Total people randomised: 59 (rufinamide group 29; placebo group 30). 1 participant assigned to rufinamide group excluded from analysis. 5 people withdrew from study: rufinamide group 4; placebo group 1 |
|
Interventions | Intervention: rufinamide 45 mg/kg (dose by body weight: 1000 mg, 1800 mg, 2400 mg, or 3200 mg) per day Control: placebo 2‐phase study: 4‐week baseline phase and 12‐week treatment phase (2‐week titration phase followed by 10‐week maintenance phase). In addition, a fourth phase: either a follow‐up visit or entry into an open‐label extension |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes (as stated in the publication)
Secondary outcomes (as stated in the publication)
|
|
Notes | Stated aim of study: "this randomized trial in Japan was conducted to evaluate efficacy and tolerability (seizure control and adverse effects) and pharmacokinetics of rufinamide as an adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome" Language of publication: English Commercial funding: yes Publication status (peer review journal): yes Publication status (journal supplement): no Publication status (abstract): no Sponsored by Eisai Pharmaceutical No conflict of interest Study design referred to previous trial of rufinamide for Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome (Glauser 2008) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation schedule that assigned each participant to rufinamide group or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants randomised to receive rufinamide or placebo in a 1:1 ratio according to body weight |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Participants and clinical staff blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Investigators blinded. Identical tablets and packaging |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All evaluated on ITT bias |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Appeared all expected and pre‐specified outcomes were reported |
Other bias | High risk | Sponsored by Eisai Inc., the manufacturer of rufinamide |
AED: antiepileptic drug; CCTV: closed‐circuit television; CT: computed tomography; ECG: electrocardiograph; EEG: electroencephalogram; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.