Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;2021(3):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub3

NCT04253405.

Study name Multicentric randomized controlled pilot study comparing high‐flow nasal cannula versus non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure in patients with pulmonary fibrosis (RENOVATE Fibrosis)
Methods RCT, parallel‐group design. Multicentre study
Participants Estimated number of participants: 50
Setting: ICU or ED, Brazil
Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18; admitted to ICU or ED with pulmonary fibrosis and AHRF
Exclusion criteria: pulmonary fibrosis secondary to progressive massive fibrosis (silicosis), or any other tumour form of fibrosis; significant pulmonary arterial hypertension; pneumothorax or extensive pleural effusion; cardiogenic pulmonary congestion; delirium or non‐co‐operation at the time of randomization; facial abnormalities; uncoercible vomiting or hypersecretion of the airways; use of continuous NIPPV or HFNC for more than 8 hours before randomization; pregnancy; refusal to participate
Interventions Intervention group (HFNC): Airvo2, Fisher & Paykel
Control group (NIV): BiPAP; oronasal or full face mask
Outcomes All outcomes measured: recruitment feasibility; dyspnoea (Borg scale); respiratory rate; oxygenation; PaCO2
Outcomes relevant to this review: dyspnoea (Borg scale); respiratory rate; oxygenation; PaCO2
Starting date 5 February 2020
Contact information Leticia Kawano‐Dourado, ldourado@hcor.com.br. Karina Negrelli, knegrelli@hcor.com.br
Notes