Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;2021(3):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub3

NCT04293991.

Study name High‐flow nasal cannula versus non‐invasive ventilation in prevention of intubation in immunocompromised patient with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Methods RCT, parallel‐group design
Participants Estimated number of participants: 76
Setting: ICU, Egypt
Inclusion criteria: admitted immunocompromised patient to ICU with AHRF; haematological malignancies; post‐bone marrow transplantation
Exclusion criteria: need of emergency intubation; patient with deterioration of conscious level with hypoxaemia with FiO2 less than 90% in spite of maximum O2 support; haemodynamic instability with need of vasoconstrictor support
Interventions Intervention group (HFNC): flow = 60 L/min and titrated downwards to comfort; patient encouraged to have mouth closed
Control group (NIV): BiPAP; face mask; IPAP = 8 to 10 cm H2O; PEEP = 5 cm H2O, to maintain a tidal volume of 6‐8 mL/kg
FiO2 titrated to SpO2 of ≥ 92% for both groups
Outcomes All outcomes measured: intubation within 48 hours of admission; 28‐day mortality
Outcomes relevant to this review: intubation within 48 hours of admission; 28‐day mortality
Starting date 3rd March 2020
Contact information Ashraf Elagamy, elagamy_ashraf@yahoo.com. Dalia Elfawy, daliamfawy@yahoo.com
Notes