Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;2020(11):CD004900. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004900.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Aramideh 1995 Not randomised
Boyle 2009 No placebo group
Fahn 1985 Unclear if this was a randomised trial or not. Primary outcome was neurophysiological
Frueh 1988 It enrolled 26 participants with blepharospasm in a randomised, double‐blind trial comparing BtA to placebo. All participants received BtA in the upper eyelids and only the lower eyelids were randomised to BtA or placebo. It was not possible to compare BtA versus placebo
Girlanda 1996 Unclear if this was a randomised trial or not. Primary outcome was neurophysiological
Iwashige 1995 No placebo group
Jankovic 1987 Participants were randomised by a toss of a coin to BtA or placebo. Although 12 participants had blepharospasm, only 3 of them did not have additional involuntary movements of the face or neck. Ineligible population
Jankovic 1995 Not randomised. No placebo group
Mezaki 1995 No placebo group
Mezaki 1999 No placebo group
Nussgens 1997 No placebo group
Pagan 2018 Duplicate of Mitsikostas 2018
Park 1993 Only 4 participants with blepharospasm were enrolled in the blinded controlled phase. The report gave no clear data comparing the BtA and placebo groups containing these 4 participants. No usable study data
Price 1997 No placebo group
Sampaio 1997 No placebo group