Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;2020(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3

23. Comparison 11 Psychosocial Risk Management 'Resettle' programme (PSRM) versus treatment‐as‐usual (probation supervision): recidivism (skewed data).

Study Outcome Experimental group: PSRM Control group: TAU Statistic Commentsa
n Mean SD n Mean SD
Nathan 2019 Recidivism: total number of official criminal offences recorded in year 1 (higher = worse outcome) 16 4.13 5.78 19 5.21 3.28 None reported Experimental group median = 2, range = 0 to 22; control group median = 4, range = 0 to 11
Nathan 2019 Recidivism: total number of official criminal offences recorded in year 2 (higher = worse outcome) 8 3.63 4.10 8 3.25 3.77 None reported Experimental group median = 2, range = 0 to 11; control group median = 1.5, range = 0 to 9
Nathan 2019 Recidivism: total number of self‐report antisocial acts as reported by SRD in year 1 (higher = worse outcome) 16 9.69 19.34 19 7.37 5.17 None reported Experimental group median = 4, range = 0 to 78; control group median = 7, range = 0 to 17
Nathan 2019 Recidivism: total number of self‐report antisocial acts as reported by SRD in year 2 (non‐cumulative) (higher = worse outcome) 8 8.75 14.05 9 7.33 9.51 None reported Experimental group median = 2, range = 0 to 38 ; control group median = 4, range = 0 to 27
AsPD: antisocial personality disorder; PSRM: Psychosocial risk management 'resettle' programme n: numbers of participants; SD: standard deviation; SRD: Self‐Report Delinquency scale; TAU: treatment as usual.

aRaw data provided by study authors; all descriptive statistics extracted by review authors for participants with a definite or probable diagnosis of AsPD.