23. Comparison 11 Psychosocial Risk Management 'Resettle' programme (PSRM) versus treatment‐as‐usual (probation supervision): recidivism (skewed data).
Study | Outcome | Experimental group: PSRM | Control group: TAU | Statistic | Commentsa | ||||
n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | ||||
Nathan 2019 | Recidivism: total number of official criminal offences recorded in year 1 (higher = worse outcome) | 16 | 4.13 | 5.78 | 19 | 5.21 | 3.28 | None reported | Experimental group median = 2, range = 0 to 22; control group median = 4, range = 0 to 11 |
Nathan 2019 | Recidivism: total number of official criminal offences recorded in year 2 (higher = worse outcome) | 8 | 3.63 | 4.10 | 8 | 3.25 | 3.77 | None reported | Experimental group median = 2, range = 0 to 11; control group median = 1.5, range = 0 to 9 |
Nathan 2019 | Recidivism: total number of self‐report antisocial acts as reported by SRD in year 1 (higher = worse outcome) | 16 | 9.69 | 19.34 | 19 | 7.37 | 5.17 | None reported | Experimental group median = 4, range = 0 to 78; control group median = 7, range = 0 to 17 |
Nathan 2019 | Recidivism: total number of self‐report antisocial acts as reported by SRD in year 2 (non‐cumulative) (higher = worse outcome) | 8 | 8.75 | 14.05 | 9 | 7.33 | 9.51 | None reported | Experimental group median = 2, range = 0 to 38 ; control group median = 4, range = 0 to 27 |
AsPD: antisocial personality disorder; PSRM: Psychosocial risk management 'resettle' programme n: numbers of participants; SD: standard deviation; SRD: Self‐Report Delinquency scale; TAU: treatment as usual. |
aRaw data provided by study authors; all descriptive statistics extracted by review authors for participants with a definite or probable diagnosis of AsPD.