Comparison 3. Contingency management + standard maintenance versus standard maintenance alone.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 Social functioning: mean family/social domain scores (high = poor); ASI; at 6 months | 1 | Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
3.2 Leaving the study early | 2 | 127 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.59 [0.28, 1.24] |
3.3 Substance misuse (drugs): numbers with cocaine‐negative specimens; at 17 weeks | 1 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
3.4 Substance misuse (drugs): numbers with cocaine‐negative specimens; at 26 weeks | 1 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
3.5 Substance misuse (drugs): numbers with cocaine‐negative specimens; at 52 weeks | 1 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
3.6 Other: proportion transferred to routine care due to poor treatment response (high = poor); by 6 months | 1 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected |