Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;2020(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3

Comparison 3. Contingency management + standard maintenance versus standard maintenance alone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Social functioning: mean family/social domain scores (high = poor); ASI; at 6 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.2 Leaving the study early 2 127 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.28, 1.24]
3.3 Substance misuse (drugs): numbers with cocaine‐negative specimens; at 17 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.4 Substance misuse (drugs): numbers with cocaine‐negative specimens; at 26 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.5 Substance misuse (drugs): numbers with cocaine‐negative specimens; at 52 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.6 Other: proportion transferred to routine care due to poor treatment response (high = poor); by 6 months 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected