Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;2020(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3

Comparison 5. Schema therapy versus treatment‐as‐usual.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
5.1 Recidivism: number of participants to recidivate, documented as a global negative outcome 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.2 Social functioning: number of patients with supervised leave at 2 years 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.3 Social functioning: number of patients with unsupervised leave at 2 years 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.4 Social functioning: number of patients with supervised leave at 3 years 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.5 Social functioning: number of patients with unsupervised leave at 3 years 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.6 Social functioning: mean number of days to unsupervised leave 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.7 Adverse events: global negative outcomes overall 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.8 Adverse events: number of patients transferred to other clinics due to lack of treatment response 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.9 Adverse events: number of patients terminating therapy due to worsening of psychiatric condition 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.10 Adverse events: number of patients that terminate therapy due to lack of treatment response 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.11 Adverse events: number of patients terminated due to lack of co‐operation with the research 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected