Ito 2014.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Identification |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Only states the study was randomised, does not ensure how sequence generation done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Only states the study was randomised, does not ensure how sequence generation done |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Imbalance in numbers for missing data across intervention groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes have been reported in The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000492 |
Other bias | Low risk | This study was supported in part by a Grant‐in‐Aid for Progressive Renal Disease Research, Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases, from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan |