Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;2021(2):CD013109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013109.pub2

Taheri CAPD 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: February 2008 to September 2008

  • Follow‐up period: 6 months

Participants
  • Setting: single centre

  • Country: Iran

  • Relevant health status: CKD‐5D on PD; NYHA classification III or IV

  • Number: treatment group (9); control group (9)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group (50.7 ± 17.4); control group (57.2 ± 13.1)

  • Sex (M): treatment group (55.6%); control group (55.6%)

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Spironolactone: 25 mg/day for 24 weeks


Control group
  • Placebo for 24 weeks

Outcomes
  • Death (any cause)

  • Death (cardiovascular)

  • Hyperkalaemia

  • Mean EF

Identification
  • Authors name: Shahram Taheri

  • Institution: Isfahan Kidney Diseases Research Center/Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Isfahan School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

  • Email: shah63tah@yahoo.com

  • Address: Soffeh Ave., Isfahan, Iran

Notes
  • Funding source: granted (research project No. 386273) by the research committee of Isfahan Kidney Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science

  • Complete follow‐up: treatment group (7/9, 77.8%); control group (9/9, 100%)

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Only states the study was randomised, does not ensure how sequence generation was done
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Only states the study was randomised, does not ensure how allocation concealment was done
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "double‐blind placebo‐controlled" clinical study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "double‐blind placebo‐controlled" clinical study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Missing outcome data balanced across intervention groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol unclear
Other bias Low risk Funding: internally funded