Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;2020(11):CD013004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013004.pub2

Tatarchenko 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Unit of randomisation: No information
Total duration of study: No information
Run‐in period: No information
Intervention time: No information
Follow‐up: No information
Setting: No information
Participants Type of heart failure: CHF, LV‐dysfunction
N = 92 (ivabradine: 29, nebivolol: 33, SC: 30)
Mean age: 57.3 ± 4.5 years
Gender: No information
Severity of condition: No information
Inclusion criteria:
  • CHF

  • NYHA II‐III


Exclusion criteria: No information
Withdrawals: No information
Interventions Intervention: Mean dose 7.5 mg twice a day
Comparison:
  • Standard care

  • Nebivolol 5 mg/d


Concomitant medications:
  • ACE inhibitors

  • Diuretics

  • Aspirins

  • Statins

  • Nitrates on demand


Excluded medications: No information
Outcomes Outcomes and time points measured in the study:
  • QoL

  • Circadian indices of myocardial ischaemia

  • Left ventricular contractility


Conclusion: "Addition of ivabradin and nebivolol to combined treatment of ischemic heart disease with LV dysfunction raises efficacy of treatment."
Notes Funding of trial: No information
Notable conflicts of interest of authors: No information
Contact to authors/unpublished data: No information
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to base judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to base judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Blinding impossible due to comparison with SC.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to base judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to base judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to base judgement
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to base judgement