Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;2020(8):CD008213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008213.pub3

Summary of findings 3. Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy compared with conventional trabeculotomy for primary congenital glaucoma.

Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy compared with conventional trabeculotomy for primary congenital glaucoma
Patient or population: children at or before five years of age with primary congenital glaucoma
Setting: university hospitals
Intervention: microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy
Comparison: conventional trabeculotomy
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No. of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Conventional trabeculotomy Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy
Mean IOP 1 year after surgery The mean IOP ranged across control groups from 11.7 to 12.8. The mean IOP in the intervention groups was 9.5 to 11.9 and on an average 1.77 lower (95% CI −2.92 to −0.63). 99 eyes
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1
Proportion with postoperative IOP ≤ 21 mmHg (surgical success) with or without glaucoma medications 1 year after surgery 577 per 1000 894 per 1000
(889 to 900) RR 1.54 (1.20 to 1.97) 99 eyes
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1
Adverse outcomes— hyphema
Up to 1 year after surgery
173 per 1000 400 per 1000
(67 to 900) RR 2.25 (1.25 to 4.04) 102 eyes
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; IOP: intraocular pressure; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Downgraded one level for imprecision of results due to small sample size.