Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;2021(4):CD012654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012654.pub2

Choi 1995.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: parallel randomized controlled clinical trial
Randomization ratio: 1:1:1 (KRG: 30; placebo: 30; trazodon: 30)
Dates when study was conducted: April 1994 to September 1994
Setting/country: outpatient/ single center/ S. Korea
Participants Inclusion criteria: participants with ED classified as type I and type IIb by radioisotope audio‐visual stimulation (AVS)‐penogram
Exclusion criteria: organic dysfunction
Baseline characteristics of participants
‐ the number of participants randomized: 90 (KRG: 30; placebo: 30; trazodon: 30)
‐ the number of participants analyzed: 90 (KRG: 30; placebo: 30; trazodon: 30)
‐ age (mean): KRG: 42.8; placebo: 45.2; trazodon: 43.2
‐ comorbidity: NR
‐ ED severity: NR
‐ Psychogenic ED: 81 (90%); mild vasculogenic: 9 (10%, 3 participants per group)
Interventions Details of intervention and control
‐ Experiment: Korean red ginseng (1800 mg/day [6 tablets of 300 mg, the frequency NR]) (commercial product from KT&G)
‐ Control: placebo; trazodon (25 mg daily at bedtime)
Number of study centres: 1
Run‐in period: no
Follow‐up period: 12 weeks
Outcomes 1) Erectile function
  • Frequency and duration of erection

  • Morning erections

  • Rigidity and girth of penile shaft during erection

  • Participant and partner satisfaction


How measured: questioning participants and their partners
Time points measured: at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Time points reported: at baseline and 12 weeks
2) Complications
How measured: NR
Time points measured: at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Time points reported: likely cumulative
Funding sources KT&G Corp. This was noted in the Korean version of the paper.
Declarations of interest NR
Notes Publication language: English
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "The patients... were randomly assigned into three groups."
Comment: no explicit explanation of the sequence generation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no detailed information about allocation concealment.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Unclear risk Comment: not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Comment: not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcome: adverse events Low risk Comment: objective outcome was not likely affected by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Erectile function and sexual satisfaction Low risk Quote: "All patients received drugs for three months. A total of 90 patients with 30 patients in each group were closely followed."
Comment: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Adverse events Low risk Quote: "All patients received drugs for three months. A total of 90 patients with 30 patients in each group were closely followed."
Comment: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Ability to have intercourse reported by participants (or partner) Low risk Quote: "All patients received drugs for three months. A total of 90 patients with 30 patients in each group were closely followed."
Comment: all participants who were randomized were included in analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
QoL Unclear risk Comment: not measured.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information available to permit a judgement and there was no published protocol.
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: the severity of erectile dysfunction at baseline was not reported between the study groups.