Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;2021(4):CD012654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012654.pub2

Ham 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: parallel randomized controlled clinical trial
Randomization ratio: 1:1 (KRG: 37, placebo: 36)
Dates when study was conducted: June 2007 to October 2007
Setting/country: outpatient/ two centers/ S. Korea
Participants Inclusion criteria: participants suffered from ED (more than 3 months), mild or moderate ED (IIEF score over 11)
Exclusion criteria: severe ED (IIEF score 0‐10), cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, unstable angina diagnosed in 6 months, use of PDE‐5 inhibitor or penile injection therapy
Baseline characteristics of participants
‐ the number of participants randomized: 73 (KRG: 37, placebo: 36)
‐ the number of participants analyzed: 69 (KRG: 35, placebo: 34)
‐ age (mean): KRG: 53.2; placebo: 50.8
‐ comorbidity: yes (diabetes mellitus: KRG (10), placebo (5); hypertension (KRG (8), placebo (9))
‐ ED severity (mean):
  • IIEF: KRG: 17.2; placebo: 17.7

Interventions Details of intervention and control
‐ Experiment: KRG plus ginsenoside (800 mg; 2 capsules of 200 mg 2 times daily)
‐ Control: placebo (capsule, microcrystalline cellulose 200 mg)
Run‐in period: no
Follow‐up period: 8 weeks
Outcomes 1) Erectile function:
How measured: questionnaire (IIEF‐15)
TIme points measured: at baseline and 8 weeks
Time points reported: at baseline and 8 weeks
2) AEs:
How measured: NR
TIme points measured: NR
Time points reported: likely cumulative
Funding sources BT Gin Inc (4‐2004‐0018); Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A084120)
Declarations of interest NR
Notes Publication language: English
Supported by commercial company (BT Gin Inc)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no explicit explanation of the sequence generation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no detailed information about allocation concealment.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Low risk Quote: " ...placebo has the same smell and flavour with KRG". "... multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo controlled study" in the title.
Comment: placebo controlled study.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Low risk Comment: placebo controlled trial.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcome: adverse events Low risk Comment: objective outcome was not likely affected by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Erectile function and sexual satisfaction Low risk Comment: 35/37 and 34/36 randomized participants in the KRG and placebo groups, respectively, were included in the analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Adverse events Low risk Comment: 35/37 and 34/36 randomized participants in the KRG and placebo groups, respectively, were included in the analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Ability to have intercourse reported by participants (or partner) Unclear risk Comment: not measured.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
QoL Unclear risk Comment: not measured.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: the outcomes were described well but the protocol was not published.
Other bias Low risk Comment: not detected.