Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;2021(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2

Fulcher 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel‐group RCT; non‐inferiority design; randomisation ratio: 1:1
Participants Inclusion criteria: T1DM, 18‐80 years, treated with insulin for 1 year or more, HbA1c 8% or more,  Additional from CSR: BMI < 35 kg/m2, Ability and willingness to perform frequent SMBG using a blood glucose meter and to perform continuous blood glucose measurements on numerous occasions 
Exclusion criteria: nightshift workers, patients with known sensitivity to the study drug or related drugs, and patients with impaired hepatic function or any other clinically relevant physiological or psychological medical conditions were excluded, Additional from CSR: treatment with any blood glucose altering drugs other than insulin in the last 4 weeks before study entry e.g. corticosteroids; pregnancy, breastfeeding; treatment with any investigational drug in the last 2 months before study entry
Diagnostic criteria:  post‐prandial C‐peptide level ≤ 0.5 nmol/L (≤ 1.5 ng/mL) in the presence of a blood glucose level ≥ 5.5 mmol/L
Number of study centres: 9
Interventions Intervention(s): glargine
Comparator(s): NPH
Duration of intervention: 30 weeks (6‐week forced titration phase + 24‐week phase)
Duration of follow‐up: 30 weeks
Run‐in period: — (but had a one‐ to two‐week screening phase before the treatment phase) 
Outcomes Reported outcome(s) in full text of publication: glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia, weight, lipid status, safety
Study registration Trial identifier: HOE901/4010 
Study terminated early: no
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding: commercial funding (Aventis)
Publication status: peer‐reviewed journal and conference abstract
Stated aim of study Quote: "To compare glycaemic control and symptomatic hypoglycaemia rates with glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients."
Notes Conference abstract added no additional information
CSR was provided by Sanofi. CSR provided protocol,  diagnostic criteria for T1DM, additional outcome data (e.g. mortality, ketoacidosis, hypoglycaemia) and information on bias.