Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 8;2020(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3

Summary of findings 2. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for the genetic analysis in in vitro fertilisation.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for the genetic analysis in in vitro fertilisation
Patient or population: couples with an in vitro fertilisation indication
Settings: fertility clinics
Intervention: PGT‐A with the use of FISH for the genetic analysis
Comparison: no PGT‐A
Outcomes per woman Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect 
(95% CI) No. of participants
(studies) Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control PGT‐A with the use of FISH for the genetic analysis
Cumulative live birth 287 per 1000 192 per 1000
(124 to 289) OR 0.59
(0.35 to 1.01) 408
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa
Live birth rate after the first embryo transfer 307 per 1000 215 per 1000
(160 to 287) OR 0.62
(0.43 to 0.91) 1680
(10 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderateb
Miscarriage 105 per 1000 108 per 1000
(81 to 143) OR 1.03
(0.75 to 1.41) 1680
(10 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatec
Ongoing pregnancy 274 per 1000 204 per 1000
(161 to 253) OR 0.68
(0.51 to 0.90) 1121
(5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb,c
Clinical pregnancy 333 per 1000 219 per 1000
(174 to 267) OR 0.56
(0.42 to 0.73) 1131
(5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatec
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; PGT‐A: preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies; RCT: randomised controlled trial
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded two levels for imprecision: results based on one study, small number of events.
bDowngraded one level for inconsistency: I² > 50% in results across studies.
cDowngraded one level for imprecision: the CI for most studies crosses the line of no effect, or small number of events.