Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;2021(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2

Comparison 2. CQ versus lopinavir/ritonavir for treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
2.1 Negative PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 on respiratory samples at day 7 from enrolment 1 22 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.20 [0.64, 2.25]
2.2 Negative PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 on respiratory samples at day 14 from enrolment 1 22 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.85, 1.36]
2.3 Discharge from hospital at day 14 from enrolment 1 22 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.91 [1.09, 3.34]
2.4 Clinical improvement at day 10 from enrolment 1 22 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.37 [0.78, 2.42]
2.5 Total adverse events 1 22 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.78, 1.50]
2.6 Serious adverse events 1 22 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable