Jain 1978.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Sample size calculation not stated |
|
Participants | Setting: New Orleans, USA. Time of study not stated Inclusion criteria: postpartum women who had an uncomplicated vaginal birth with moderate or severe uterine cramp pain (self‐rated pain score of 60% or more). The women were aged between 16 and 35 years Exclusion criteria: women dependent on analgesics or tranquillisers or hypersensitive to salicylates or caffeine. Women with gastrointestinal, hepatic or renal disease or history of psychiatric illness |
|
Interventions | Following initial pain assessment participants were allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups and given 1 dose of study medication
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | This study included women with perineal pain and reported the majority of pain assessments including both groups of women Dates of study: not stated Funding sources: blinded drugs supplied by American Home Products. Statistical support from Ives Laboratories and Wyeth Laboratories Declarations of interest: none stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Methods state "patients were separated at random". Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data on all women randomised are reported. There were 7 women allocated to the aspirin 650 mg group, and 8 women to each of the aspirin 800 mg and placebo groups. Baseline pain and all reported pain outcomes were included for the 23 women with uterine pain |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No published protocol or trial registration |
Other bias | Low risk | No other risk of bias identified |