Guimaraes 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: parallel, RCT. Recruitment period: February 2004 to October 2007. Duration of study: study start date: February 2004. Actual primary completion date: October 2007. Actual study completion date: April 2008. Study setting: outpatient. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. |
|
Participants |
Key inclusion criteria: participants aged between 25 and 65 years old with a recent diagnosis of moderate obstructive sleep apnoea. Key exclusion criteria: BMI higher than 40 kg/m2; facial malformations; regular use of hypnotic medications; hypothyroidism; previous stroke; neuromuscular disease; heart failure; coronary disease; severe obstructive nasal disease. Age (years)*: mean (SD): 47.7(9.8) in myofunctional therapy group and 51.5 (6.8) in control group. Gender*: 10 women, 21 men. Comorbidities*: 26/31 hypertension; 2/31 diabetes. BMI*: mean (SD): 29.6 (3.8) in myofunctional therapy group and 31.0 (2.8) in control group. AHI (events/hour)*: mean (SD): 22.4 (4.8) in myofunctional therapy group and 22.4 (5.4) in control group. ESS*: mean (SD): 14 (5) in myofunctional therapy group and 14 (7) in control group. PSQI*: mean (SD): 10 (4) in myofunctional therapy group and 11 (4) in control group. * Data from the 31 included in analysis. N randomised: 39. N analysed: 31, 16 myofunctional therapy and 15 control. Dropouts: 8 participants, 3 in the myofunctional therapy and 5 in control group. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: oropharyngeal exercises. The participants were instructed by one speech pathologist to perform the following tasks:
Stomatognathics functions:
The same schedule and set of instructions applied to the control group were given to participants with the substitution of deep breathing by effective therapy. Comparator: sham therapy A weekly, supervised session (30 minutes) of deep breathing through the nose while sitting. The patients were also instructed to perform the same procedure at home once a day (30 minutes), plus nasal lavage with application of 10 mL of saline in each nostril three times a day. At study entry, bilateral chewing was recommended when eating meals. Concomitant interventions: none. |
|
Outcomes |
Prespecified outcomes: Primary outcome:
Secondary outcomes:
Time points of measurement: 3 months. Reported outcomes: all prespecified outcomes. |
|
Notes | Additional information requested and received from authors on allocation procedures. Three of the RCTs included in this review were leaded by the same researcher and allocation procedure were similar (Guimaraes 2009, Ieto 2015 and Kayamori 2015). Funding for trial: supported by Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, and the E. J. Zerbini Foundation. Conflicts of Interest: quote: “None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.” Registered: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00660777. Sample size calculations: not reported. Data sharing statement: none. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "We typed equal number of (1 or 2), corresponding to control or treatment and put all the small papers (A or B) in a sealed envelope. One paper was picked up for each patient in the moment of randomisation by someone that was not involved in the study.” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | See random sequence generation above. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: “Masking: Single (Participant)”. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: “Masking: Single (Participant)”. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Relevant percentages of losses in follow‐up. Quotes: “we recruited 39 patients. Eight patients (3 in the active treatment arm) were excluded due to low adherence”. “Patients who failed to return for three consecutive weeks or failed to comply with the exercises at home (performing 85% of the exercises) were excluded from the study." Per protocol analysis "31 patients included in the final analysis". |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Prespecified outcomes in clinicaltrials.gov were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias. |