Kayamori 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: parallel, RCT. Recruitment period: not available. Duration of study: not available. Study setting: outpatient. Sleep Laboratory of the Department of Pulmonology, Heart Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil. |
|
Participants |
Key inclusion criteria: participants of both sexes, aged between 20 and 65 years old, recently diagnosed with primary snore, mild, moderate or severe OSA, who refused to use CPAP were included. Key exclusion criteria: participants with BMI equal or higher than 35 kg/m2, craniofacial deformities, edentulous, regular use of hypnotic medication, severe nasal obstruction, patients undergoing other treatments for OSA and patients with unavailability to comply with the protocol. Age (years): mean (SD): 46.3 (18.8) in therapy group and 45.5 (11.7) in control group. Gender: 34 men, 24 women. BMI: mean (SD): 28.9 (3.5) in therapy group and 28.7 (3.4) in control group. AHI (events/hour): mean (SD): 19.5 (14.2) in therapy group and 17.2 (10.94) in control group. ESS: mean (SD): 9.9 (5.0) in therapy group and 10.3(5.2) in control group. PSQI: mean (SD): 6.3 (3.5) in therapy group and 6.9 (3.3) in control group. N randomised: 60, 30 to therapy group and 30 to control group. N analysed: 58. Dropouts: 2 in control group. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: oropharyngeal exercises. As follows:
12 weekly sessions lasting approximately 30 minutes. Comparator: nasal dilator strips during sleep. Participants were instructed to use nasal dilator strips during sleep and to perform breathing exercises 3 times a day daily, increasing the time of inspiration and expiration during sessions using diaphragmatic expansion. 12 weekly sessions lasting approximately 30 minutes. Concomitant interventions: all patients from both groups were instructed to wash with 10 mL of saline solution in both nostrils 3 times a day. |
|
Outcomes |
Prespecified outcomes: protocol not available. Reported outcomes: Primary outcome measures:
Secondary outcome measures:
Time points of measurement: before and 13 weeks after the treatment. |
|
Notes | Information from PhD thesis. Additional information requested and received from authors on allocation procedures, Three of the RCTs included in this review were leaded by the same researcher and allocation procedure were similar (Guimaraes 2009, Ieto 2015 and Kayamori 2015). Funding for trial: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) e Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Conflicts of interest: not reported. Registered: not reported. Sample size calculations: "The sample calculation was based on the assumption of a reduction of approximately 1.5 cm H2O in the Pcrit with previous knowledge of a drop of approximately 40% in the AHI in the Therapy group and a reduction of 5% in the Control group in a previous study. We calculated a total number of 34 patients, considering a significance value of p=0.05 and standard deviation of 1.3 and power of 90%. Considering possible withdrawals and other events the total number of 40 patients." Data sharing statement: none. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "We typed equal number of (1 or 2), corresponding to control or treatment and put all the small papers (A or B) in a sealed envelope. One paper was picked up for each patient in the moment of randomisation by someone that was not involved in the study.” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | See random sequence generation above. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded study. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded study. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 2 patients lost in the control group. No imputation methods reported for their results. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Provided information on results for the outcomes considered relevant for the study Protocol of the study not available. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias. |