Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;2021(2):CD012882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012882.pub2

7. Comparison 1 results: coverage of appropriate treatment by an appropriate provider.

Outcome Trial ID Study design Preintervention coverage Postintervention coverage Risk ratio (95% CI)
iCCM Control iCCM Control
Coverage of appropriate treatment from an appropriate provider for any iCCM illness Mubiru 2015 (diarrhoea) CBA 2.2%
3/136
5.8%
11/191
16.1%
30/186
1.6%
3/188
10.11 (3.14 to 32.55)a
Mubiru 2015 (malaria) CBA 32.4%
77/238
49.2%
184/374
64.1%
236/368
67.7%
342/505
0.95 (0.86 to 1.04)a
Yansaneh 2014 (diarrhoea) CBA 31.6%
237/751
35.67%
237/664
52.2%
335/642
53.8%
394/733
0.97 (0.88 to 1.07)a
Yansaneh 2014 (malaria) CBA 29.8%
581/1948
30.9%
562/1819
29.2%
412/1413
38.2%
712/1863
0.76 (0.69 to 0.84)a
Coverage of appropriate treatment from an appropriate provider for diarrhoea Mubiru 2015 CBA 2.2%
3/136
5.8%
11/191
16.1%
30/186
1.6%
3/188
10.11 (3.14 to 32.55)a
Yansaneh 2014 CBA 31.6%
237/751
35.67%
237/664
52.2%
335/642
53.8%
394/733
0.97 (0.88 to 1.07)a
Coverage of appropriate treatment by an appropriate provider for malaria Mubiru 2015 CBA 32.4%
77/238
49.2%
184/374
64.1%
236/368
67.7%
342/505
0.95 (0.86 to 1.04)a
Yansaneh 2014 CBA 29.8%
581/1948
30.9%
562/1819
29.2%
412/1413
38.2%
712/1863
0.76 (0.69 to 0.84)a

CBA: controlled before‐after study; CI: confidence intervals; iCCM: integrated community case management.
aWe recalculated results for Mubiru 2015 and Yansaneh 2014 based on unadjusted counts (see Data extraction and management).