. 2021 Feb 10;2021(2):CD012882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012882.pub2

13. Comparison 1 results: coverage of careseeking to an iCCM provider.

Outcome	Trial ID	Study design	Preintervention coverage		Postintervention coverage		Cluster‐adjusted relative effect (95% CI)	Coverage indicators analysis summary
Outcome	Trial ID	Study design	iCCM	Control	iCCM	Control	Cluster‐adjusted relative effect (95% CI)	Coverage indicators analysis summary
Coverage of careseeking to an iCCM provider for diarrhoea	White 2018	CBA	0% 0/103	0% 0/81	49/106 46.2%	0% 0/173	RR 160.99 (10.03 to 2582.96)	Recalculated, unadjusted results^a
Coverage of careseeking to an iCCM provider for diarrhoea	Yansaneh 2014	CBA	0.2% 1/644	0.2% 1/644	8.3% 53/642	0.0% 0/733	RR122.14 (7.56 to 1974.18)	Recalculated, unadjusted results^a
Coverage of careseeking to an iCCM provider for fever	White 2018	CBA	0% 0/140	0% 0/115	55.8% 86/154	0% 0/227	RR 251.79 (15.65 to 4051.21)	Recalculated, unadjusted results^a
Coverage of careseeking to an iCCM provider for fever	Yansaneh 2014	CBA	0.1% 2/1948	0.4% 8/1819	6.7% 95/1413	0.0% 0/1863	RR 251.79 (15.65 to 4041.21)	Recalculated, unadjusted results^a
Coverage of careseeking to an iCCM provider for suspected pneumonia	White 2018	CBA	0% 0/48	0% 0/36	75.4% 86/114	0% 0/97	RR 254.48 (15.91 to 4070.50)	Recalculated, unadjusted results^a
	Yansaneh 2014	CBA	0.0% 0/515	0.2% 1/595	7.9% 42/529	0.0% 0/530	RR 85.16 (5.25 to 1380.23)	Recalculated, unadjusted results^a

CBA: controlled before‐after study; CI: confidence interval; iCCM: integrated community case management; RR: risk ratio. ^aWe recalculated results for Mubiru 2015, White 2018 and Yansaneh 2014 based on unadjusted counts (see Data extraction and management).