Ma 2019a.
Methods |
Design: cluster‐randomized controlled trial Unit of randomization: village |
Participants | Children aged < 5 years of age and caregivers in households located in the trial catchment area that had ≥ 1 child under 5 years of age. In households with > 1 child, the youngest child was recruited. Following the baseline, children were not excluded from subsequent surveys if they had their 5th birthday before the surveys were implemented. |
Interventions |
Intervention
Based on this intervention the study would not meet inclusion criteria for this review due to "wrong intervention" (only CHVs only treated diarrhoea); however, we will assess for inclusion at the next update of this review. Comparison
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes
Secondary outcomes
Based on the above outcomes the study would not meet the inclusion criteria for this review; however, we will assess for inclusion at the next update of this review. |
Notes |
Objective: to assess the effect of a CHV intervention on reducing diarrhoea and fever prevalence in children aged < 5 years, and the participants were followed up at 6 months and 12 months after the intervention started. Associations of CHVs' home visit coverage and intensity with the primary outcomes, 14‐day diarrhoea and fever prevalence, were also examined. Location: 40 communities (20 intervention communities, 20 control communities) in the Volta region, Ghana. Funding source: Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) under the "Project for Improving Maternal and Child Healthcare in Volta Region, Ghana (P2013‐001921). The authors stated: "The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." |