Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD006142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006142.pub3

de Paiva Tosato 2007.

Methods Type of study: parallel RCT.
Condition and number of participants randomised: temporomandibular pain (? acute pain), 20.
Groups: massage group, 10; TENS group, 10.
Participants Demographics: N = 20, 22 to 46 yrs, 31.75 ± 8.71 (mean ± SD), all female.
Setting: not detailed.
Inclusion: signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders; females.
Exclusion: no temporomandibular pain; males; dental problems; systemic disease; patients having other treatment (dental treatment, physiotherapy, medication).
Withdrawals/dropouts: not detailed.
Interventions Where applied: not detailed.
Applied by: not detailed.
Waveform: not detailed.
Frequency: not detailed.
Pulse duration: not detailed.
Pulse amplitude/Intensity: participants told the sensation should be pleasant and were told to report whenever the intensity of the current decreased.
Electrodes: not detailed. Placed over masseter muscle, anterior portion of temporal muscle.
Duration and frequency of Rx: 30 min, 1 Rx.
Device/manufacturer: Quark.
Adverse effects: not detailed.
Outcomes Pain outcome: VAS for pain intensity, before and after Rx.
ITT/per protocol analysis: not detailed.
Statistical analysis: statistically significant reduction in VAS scores post Rx in both groups.
Notes