Comparison 3. Transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid vs laparoscopic salpingectomy.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
3.1 Surgical complication rate	1	160	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	Not estimable
3.2 Clinical pregnancy rate	1	160	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.69 [0.44, 1.07]
3.3 Miscarriage rate	1	160	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.00 [0.20, 5.08]
3.4 Ectopic pregnancy rate	1	160	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	7.39 [0.15, 372.38]
3.5 Mean number of oocytes	1	160	Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.34 [‐0.85, 1.53]
3.6 Mean number of embryos	1	160	Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.35 [‐0.70, 1.40]
3.7 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy)	1	54	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.53 [0.28, 8.45]