Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;2020(8):CD013063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013063.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Embryo culture supernatant compared to culture medium injection for subfertile women in assisted reproduction.

Embryo culture supernatant compared to culture medium injection for subfertile women in assisted reproduction
Patient or population: Subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction
Setting: IVF Units
Intervention: Embryo culture supernatant injection before embryo transfer
Comparison: Culture medium injection
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Quality of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with culture medium injection Risk with embryo culture supernatant
Live birth/ongoing pregnancy Not reported in any study in this comparison        
Miscarriage Not reported in any study in this comparison        
Clinical pregnancy 583 per 1,000 604 per 1,000
(402 to 775) OR 1.09
(0.48 to 2.46) 96
(1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW1,2  
Ectopic pregnancy Not reported in any study in this comparison        
Multiple pregnancy Not reported in any study in this comparison        
Preterm delivery Not reported in any study in this comparison        
Foetal abnormalities Not reported in any study in this comparison        
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may
change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to
change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Downgraded two levels for imprecision; wide CIs and low number of events
2 Downgraded one level due to studies at high risk of bias and unclear risk of publication bias