Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;2020(8):CD013063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013063.pub2

Comparison 3. Subgroup analysis, type of cycle.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 live birth/ongoing pregnancy 3 340 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.73, 1.70]
3.1.1 fresh cycle 2 280 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.44 [0.90, 2.30]
3.1.2 frozen cycle 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.30 [0.10, 0.92]
3.2 Miscarriage 4 430 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.44, 1.78]
3.2.1 fresh cycle 3 370 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.25, 1.27]
3.2.2 frozen cycle 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 7.25 [0.82, 64.46]
3.3 clinical pregnancy 5 526 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.80, 1.61]
3.3.1 fresh cycle 3 370 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.77, 1.78]
3.3.2 frozen cycle 2 156 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.56, 1.98]
3.4 multiple pregnancy 2 150 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.26, 1.83]
3.4.1 fresh cycle 1 90 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.75 [0.39, 7.81]
3.4.2 frozen cycle 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.07, 1.29]