Arslan 2011.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 2 groups, monoprophylaxis |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Dexamethasone
Metoclopramide
Included criteria: patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (25 to 55 years of age; 48 women) with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system risk of I or II Excluded criteria: history of hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; haematological or gastrointestinal disorders, or both; hypersensitivity to propofol or to any other drug; history of vertigo or motion sickness; previous postoperative emesis; pregnant or breastfeeding or menstruating women; use of an antiemetic agent within 24 hours before surgery; laparoscopy replaced by laparotomy Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, non‐smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness): no; (perioperative opioids): unclear |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Dexamethasone
Metoclopramide
|
|
Outcomes |
Vomiting (0 to 4 hours)
Vomiting (4 to 12 hours))
PONV (0 to 24 hours)
Adverse events (general notes in the publication, 24 hours' observation)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: NA Country: Turkey Setting: inpatient, single‐centre Author's name: Mustafa Arslan Institution: Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Email: mustarslan@gmail.com Address: Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Emek 06510 Ankara, Turkey Duration of study: NA Language: English Study's primary outcome: primary end point of this study was total PONV rate up to 24 hours post anaesthesia Trial registry number: NA |
|
Notes | None&& | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "using a computer‐generated random number table" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no statement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "patients, the anesthesiologist attending during surgery, and the anesthesiologist who collected postoperative data were all blinded to the randomization process and the identity of the study drugs" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "patients, the anesthesiologist attending during surgery, and the anesthesiologist who collected postoperative data were all blinded to the randomization process and the identity of the study drugs" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "a total of 64 patients were approached for study inclusion, 4 of whom were excluded based on criteria described previously" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Quote: "no statistically significant between‐group differences were found in the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics" Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, non‐smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness): no; (perioperative opioids): unclear |