Graczyk 1997.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 4 groups, monoprophylaxis, dose‐finding study |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Placebo
Dolasetron (12.5 mg group)
Dolasetron (25 mg group)
Dolasetron (50 mg group)
Included criteria: females scheduled for outpatient laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery with general anaesthesia, 18 years of age and older, not pregnant, ASA I or II Excluded criteria: experienced preoperative nausea and/or vomiting within 24 hours of surgery or had taken any drug with antiemetic activity within that time; had taken an investigational drug within 30 days; significant cardiac conduction abnormalities; major organ dysfunction; exceeded ideal body weight by > 75%. No surgical procedures other than the primary gynaecologic procedure were allowed in patients who took part in the study Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, history of PONV, perioperative opioids): no; (history of motion sickness, non‐smoker): unclear |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Placebo
Dolasetron (12.5 mg group)
Dolasetron (25 mg group)
Dolasetron (50 mg group)
|
|
Outcomes |
Complete response (no PONV) in 24 hours
Headache (0 to 24 hours)
Sedation/drowsiness (0 to 24 hours)
Adverse events (general notes in the publication, 24 hours' observation)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: NA Country: USA Setting: outpatient, multi‐centre (25) Author's name: Sarena G. Graczyk Institution: Anesthesiologists of Columbia, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, tMagee‐Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Email: NA Address: Anaesthesiologists of Columbia, PA, Columbia, SC 29220, USA Language: English Duration of study: NA Trial registry number: NA Study's primary outcome: complete response in 24 hours (no emetic episodes, no rescue medication) |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomized" Judgement comment: no further information on sequence generation provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no statement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "double‐blind" Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding method |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding method ("double‐blind") |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "...intent‐to‐treat population), 612 (96%) had no major protocol deviations and were evaluable for efficacy" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a trial registry and no published study protocol available |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Quote: "...and were evaluable for efficacy. No statistically significant differences among the treatment groups were observed at baseline for any patient characteristic (Table 1). Overall, the study population was 70% Caucasian and had a mean age of 32 yr. Approximately 25% of the patients had a previous history of PONV. The anesthesia procedures, including use of muscle relaxants, induction, and reversal drugs were statistically comparable among the treatment groups (Table 2). In addition, there were no differences among the groups in concomitant medications or use of postoperative analgesics that would be expected to influence efficacy or safety data. Adverse event data were summarized" Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, history of PONV, perioperative opioids): no; (history of motion sickness, non‐smoker): unclear |