Gugale 2016.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 2 groups, monoprophylaxis |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Granisetron
Palonosetron
Included criteria: 60 patients (18 to 65 years of age), ASA I and II, undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries, either appendectomy or cholecystectomy Excluded criteria: gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, perioperative opioids): no; (history of PONV/motion sickness, duration of anaesthesia, non‐smoker): unclear |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Granisetron
Palonosetron
|
|
Outcomes |
Subjects with any AE (0 to 72 hours)
Adverse events (general notes in the publication, overall, exact time point unknown)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: nil Country: India Setting: inpatient, single‐centre Author's name: Pradnya Milind Bhalerao Institution: Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, B.J. Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India Email: dr.pradnyabhalerao@gmail.com Address: D‐15/10‐11, Saritanagari‐2, Off, Sinhagad Road, Pune ‐ 411 030, Maharashtra, India Language: English Duration of study: NA Trial registry number: NA Study's primary outcome: complete response at 24 to 72 hours |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "...were enrolled in each group. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two prophylactic interventions by a computer‐generated number table. This prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, comparative study..." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no statement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "this prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, comparative study was..." Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding ("double‐blinded") |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement comment: no missing outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, perioperative opioids): no; (history of PONV/motion sickness, duration of anaesthesia, non‐smoker): unclear |