Lee D 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 3 groups, monoprophylaxis, different routes of administration |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Control
Ramosetron (IV group)
Ramosetron (PO group)
Included criteria: women, ASA I or II, 18 to 60 years of age, undergoing general anaesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopy Excluded criteria: gastrointestinal disease, history of motion sickness, previous episode of PONV, menstruating, had taken an antiemetic medication within 24 hours before surgery Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, history of PONV/motion sickness): no; (non‐smoker, perioperative opioids): unclear |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Control
Ramosetron (IV group)
Ramosetron (PO group)
|
|
Outcomes |
Headache (0 to 24 hours)
Adverse events (general notes in the publication, 24 hours' observation)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: this study was supported by Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea Country: Korea Setting: inpatient, single‐centre Author's name: H.J. Kwak Institution: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gil Medical Center Email: NA Address: Gachon University of Medicine and Science, 1198 Guwol‐dong, Namdong‐gu, Incheon 405‐760, Korea Duration of study: NA Language: English Study's primary outcome: incidence of complete response (no nausea, no retching, no vomiting) Trial registry number: NA |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "effects on postoperative nausea 47 0.3 mg IV ramosetron (IV group), or 0.1 mg oral ramosetron (PO group), using a sealed envelope system. An independent researcher prepared..." Quote: "patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups (n = 40 in each), to receive saline (control group)" Judgement comment: insufficient information on random sequence generation (shuffling envelopes?) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "...using a sealed envelope system. An independent researcher prepared the study solutions, which consisted of a drinking cup containing 10 ml saline and a syringe with 2 ml normal saline in the control group, a cup containing 10 ml saline and a syringe with 0.3 mg ramosetron in the IV group, and a cup containing completely dissolved ramosetron tablets in 10 ml saline and a syringe with 2 ml saline in the PO group. The oral test drug..." Judgement comment: not stated; "sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes" (SNOSE) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "the oral test drug was administered 1 hour before surgery and the IV test drug was injected immediately after the induction of anaesthesia by an investigator who was blinded to the study" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "all episodes of PONV (nausea, retching, and vomiting) during the periods 0 to 1 hour and 1 to 24 hours after anaesthesia were recorded by nursing staff who were unaware of which treatment each patient had been given" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement comment: no missing outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Quote: "there were no differences in patient characteristics among the three groups (Table 2)" Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, history of PONV/motion sickness): no; (non‐smoker, perioperative opioids): unclear |