Millar 1987.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 3 groups, monoprophylaxis, dose‐finding study |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Placebo
Droperidol (0.25 mg group)
Droperidol (0.5 mg group)
Included criteria: 150 patients who presented for day‐case termination of pregnancy, over 16 years of age, assessed preoperatively as ASA I or II, not taking antiemetics or drugs with a possible interaction with droperidol Excluded criteria: NA Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, perioperative opioids): no; (history of motion sickness, non‐smoker): unclear; (history of PONV): yes |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Placebo
Droperidol (0.25 mg group)
Droperidol (0.5 mg group)
|
|
Outcomes |
Vomiting (0 to 2 hours)
Vomiting (2 to 24 hours)
Headache (0 to 24 hours)
Sedation/drowsiness (0 to 24 hours)
Adverse events (general notes in the publication, 24 hours' observation)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: NA Country: Australia Setting: outpatient, single‐centre Author's name: J.M. Millar Institution: Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics and Radcliffe Infirmary, Victoria Email: NA Address: Radcliff Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE Duration of study: NA Language: English Study's primary outcome: NA Trial registry number: NA |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "the patients were assigned randomly to one of three groups to receive intravenously either sterile water, droperidol 0.25 mg or droperidol 0.5 mg" Judgement comment: no further information on sequence generation provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no statement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "pharmacy prepared identical, randomly numbered ampoules that contained the test dose in 0.5 ml" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "a direct enquiry about postoperative nausea and vomiting was made al this time, and questionnaires and prepaid envelopes were given to the patients with instructions that these should be completed 24 hours after discharge" Quote: "the patients were assessed by an experienced anaesthetist and deemed fit for discharge if they were free from significant pain, sedation and nausea, had no surgical complications such as continued blood loss. and could dress themselves and walk steadily" Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding of recovery staff and anaesthetist who assessed the outcomes. For the 24 hour time point questionnaires were used |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "there was a 76% response to the questionnaire (Table 4)..." Quote: "test for nonparametric data. The results of six patients were excluded from the trial due to noncompliance with the protocol. Thc characteristics..." Judgement comment: all missing data before discharge with reasons explained. High rate of loss of response to the questionnaire at 24 hours (24%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported |
Other bias | High risk | Quote: "the characteristics of the three groups were similar. There were no significant differences in age, weight or gestation. Significantly fewer patients in the group that received droperidol 0.5 mg had had a previous anaesthetic, and a significantly greater proportion of patients in both droperidol groups gave a history of nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia" Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, perioperative opioids): no; (history of motion sickness, non‐smoker): unclear; (history of PONV): yes |