Park 2011.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 2 groups, monoprophylaxis |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Ondansetron
Palonosetron
Included criteria: at least 21 years old, ASA I or II, scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery of at least 1 hour duration at Incheon St Mary’s Hospital, Incheon, female, used opioids to control postoperative pain, had at least 2 risk factors for PONV Excluded criteria: received antiemetics, steroids or psychoactive medications within 24 hours of study initiation, vomiting or retching in 24 hours before surgery, had received cancer chemotherapy within 4 weeks or emetogenic radiotherapy within 8 weeks before study entry, ongoing vomiting from gastrointestinal disease Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, non‐smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness): no; (perioperative opioids): unclear |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Ondansetron
Palonosetron
|
|
Outcomes |
Vomiting (0 to 24 hours)
Vomiting (0 to 2 hours)
Vomiting (6 to 24 hours)
PONV (0 to 24 hours)
Complete response (no PONV) in 24 hours
Headache (0 to 24 hours)
Constipation (0 to 24 hours)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: NA Country: Korea Setting: inpatient, single‐centre Author's name: Eun Jung Cho Institution: Incheon St Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea Email: gkjw2000@catholic.ac.kr Address: Department of Anaeshtesiology and Pain Medicine, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 665‐8 Bupyeong 6 dong, Pupyeonggu, Incheon 403‐720, Republic of Korea Duration of study: June to September 2010 Language: English Study's primary outcome: incidence of PONV Trial registry number: NA |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "assigned by computer‐ generated random numbers" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "placed them in numbered, sealed envelopes" Judgement comment: not stated; "sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes" (SNOSE) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "trained nurses who did not participate in the study prepared the drugs according to manufacturers’ instructions" Judgement comment: no statement whether drugs were unlabelled and were undistinguishable from one another |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no statement on blinding of outcome assessors |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "in total, 90 patients were recruited, all of whom completed the study" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight, ASA): no. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, non‐smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness): no; (perioperative opioids): unclear |