Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 19;2020(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2

Scuderi 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomized controlled trial
Study grouping: 2 groups, monoprophylaxis
Participants Baseline characteristics
Ondansetron
  • Assessed for eligibility (n): ‐

  • Enrolled (n): ‐

  • Randomized (n): 285

  • Received treatment (n): NA

  • Analysed (n): 285

  • Age (mean ± SD, median (IQR), median (range)): 37.5 ± 11

  • Weight (mean ± SD, median (IQR), median (range)): 175 ± 46

  • BMI (mean ± SD, median (IQR), median (range)): NA

  • ASA I/II/III/IV (n): NA

  • Gender (female in %): 63.5

  • Non‐smoker (%): NA

  • History of PONV/motion sickness (%): NA

  • Type of general anaesthesia: balanced anaesthesia (99.3% fentanyl, 93% N₂O, 45.7% isoflurane, 54% sevoflurane)

  • Duration of anaesthesia or surgery (in min; as mean or median): 62

  • Use of perioperative opioids (if yes, which?): 283 patients received intraoperative fentanyl, 1 patient received morphine

  • Type of surgery: "outpatient surgery"


Placebo
  • Assessed for eligibility (n): ‐

  • Enrolled (n): ‐

  • Randomized (n): 290

  • Received treatment (n): NA

  • Analysed (n): 290

  • Age (mean ± SD, median (IQR), median (range)): 39 ± 12

  • Weight (mean ± SD, median (IQR), median (range)): 174 ± 48

  • BMI (mean ± SD, median (IQR), median (range)): NA

  • ASA I/II/III/IV (n): NA

  • Gender (female in %): 63.1

  • Non‐smoker (%): NA

  • History of PONV/motion sickness (%): NA

  • Type of general anaesthesia: balanced anaesthesia (99.7% fentanyl, 96.2% N₂O, 46.2% isoflurane, 53.8% sevoflurane)

  • Duration of anaesthesia or surgery (in min; as mean or median): 67

  • Use of perioperative opioids (if yes, which?): 289 patients received intraoperative fentanyl, no patients received morphine

  • Type of surgery: "outpatient surgery"


Included criteria: men and women, 18 to 65 years of age, ASA I to III, undergoing outpatient surgery or for short stay (23 hours or less)
Excluded criteria: NA
Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight): no; (ASA): unclear. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, perioperative opioids): no; (history of PONV/motion sickness, non‐smoker): unclear (however ‐> stratification to eight subgroups on the presence of PONV risk factors)
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Ondansetron
  • Dose: 4 mg

  • Time point of administration: at induction of anaesthesia

  • Route of administration: IV

  • Rescue antiemetics (if yes, which?): randomized to 1 mg ondansetron or saline


Placebo
  • Dose: saline

  • Time point of administration: at induction of anaesthesia

  • Route of administration: IV

  • Rescue antiemetics (if yes, which?): randomized to 1 mg ondansetron or saline

Outcomes Vomiting (0 to 2 hours)
  • Outcome type: dichotomous outcome

Identification Sponsorship source: financial support was received from the Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Country: USA
Setting: outpatient, single‐centre
Author's name: Phillip E. Scuderi
Institution: Wake Forest University School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA
Email: pscuderi@wfubmc.edu
Address: Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston‐Salem, North Carolina 27157‐1009, USA
Duration of study: NA
Language: English
Study's primary outcome: patient satisfaction with management of PONV, time to discharge from PACU
Trial registry number: NA
Notes There is a second randomization for participants who require treatment of PONV (ondansetron vs placebo)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Judgement comment: quote: "...by random number table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Judgement comment: no statement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding ("double‐blinded")
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Judgement comment: insufficient information on blinding ("double‐blinded")
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Judgement comment: no missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported
Other bias Unclear risk Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight): no; (ASA): unclear. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, perioperative opioids): no; (history of PONV/motion sickness, non‐smoker): unclear (however ‐> stratification to eight subgroups on the presence of PONV risk factors)