Wu 2000.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: 4 groups, monoprophylaxis and combination prophylaxis |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Placebo
Droperidol
Ondansetron
Droperidol + ondansetron
Included criteria: ASA I to III, female outpatients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic gynaecological procedure under general anaesthesia, 16 to 65 years of age Excluded criteria: laboratory or clinical evidence of cardiovascular, haematologic, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, neurological, or endocrine abnormalities; pregnancy; morbid obesity (those > 25% above ideal body weight); history of substance abuse; antiemetic or psychoactive medication within 24 hours before surgery; previous allergic reaction to serotonin antagonists; need for a nasogastric tube postoperatively Pretreatment: baseline characteristics (age, weight): no; (ASA): unclear. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, history of PONV, perioperative opioids): no; (non‐smoker): unclear; (history of motion sickness): yes |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Placebo
Droperidol
Ondansetron
Droperidol + ondansetron
|
|
Outcomes |
PONV (0 to 24 hours)
Adverse events (general notes in the publication, 24 hours' observation)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: supported by St. Michael’s Hospital Health Science Research Center, Toronto and in part by Glaxo, Inc. of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Country: Canada Setting: outpatients, single‐centre Author's name: Susan Belo Institution: Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Email: belos@smh.toronto.on.ca Address: Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8 Canada Duration of study: NA Language: English Study's primary outcome: incidence of PONV Trial registry number: NA |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "upon consent, each patient was randomized to one of four intravenous treatment categories" Judgement comment: no further information on sequence generation provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no statement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "in this way, the anesthesiologist, study investigator, patient, operating room attendants, and recovery room nurses, were all blinded to the identity of the prophylactic treatment" Quote: "each of these therapy medications was prepared by either the operating room pharmacist (not otherwise involved in the study) or by the research coordinator, and presented to the attending anesthesiologist" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "in this way, the anesthesiologist, study investigator, patient, operating room attendants, and recovery room nurses, were all blinded to the identity of the prophylactic treatment" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "there were eight study patients (two from the placebo group, three from the ondansetron group, two from the droperidol group, and one from the combination group) excluded from the study because they were inadvertently given thiopentol for induction of anesthesia. Thiopentol has been known to cause post‐operative nausea and vomiting. 2 0 Three study patients (one in the droperidol group, one in the ondansetron group, and one in the combination group) were admitted due to surgical complications unrelated to the study" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: no reference to a study protocol or trial registry number reported |
Other bias | High risk | Quote: "no differences in demographic data among the four treatment groups in regards to age, height, weight, history of PONV after previous general anesthesia, duration of anesthesia, and history of motion sickness were found (Table I). There were also no differences among study groups in administration of midazolam, opioids given intraoperatively and post‐ operatively, all known to have anti‐emetic or emetic properties. However, the combination group did receive more nitrous oxide 70% than the other groups (Table II) which may lead to increased PONV" Judgement comment: baseline characteristics (age, weight): no; (ASA): unclear. Potential effect modifiers (gender, duration of anaesthesia, history of PONV, perioperative opioids): no; (non‐smoker): unclear; (history of motion sickness): yes |