Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;2020(11):CD012078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012078.pub2

Makiyama 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Multicentre open‐label phase 2 RCT
Participants Diagnosis: HER2‐positive advanced unresectable or recurrent G/GEJ cancer
Previous treatment status: progression first‐line chemotherapy with trastuzumab + fluoropyrimidine + platinum; ECOG0‐2
Number of participants: 89 enrolled between December 2012 to October 2016
Study locations: 8 centres in Japan
Other relevant key eligibility criteria were: ECOG PS 0‐2; expected survival ≥ 90 days; measurable or evaluable lesion, adequate bone marrow and kidney/liver functions; left ventricular Ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% measured by echocardiography or multi‐gated acquisition scan (MUGA)
Interventions Arm A (44 participants): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on Day 1, 8, 15 of 28‐day cycle and trastuzumab 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of 21‐day cycle
Arm B (45 participants): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on Day 1, 8, 15 of 28‐day cycle
Outcomes Primary endpoint: PFS
Secondary endpoints: OS, RR, safety and translational biomarker research
Notes Only abstract published
UMIN000009297
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unable to assess on the published abstract
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unable to assess on the published abstract
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Open‐label study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Unable to assess on the published abstract
Imbalance in baseline characteristics across arms (confounding) Unclear risk Unable to assess on the published abstract
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) for outcomes other than QoL Unclear risk Unable to assess on the published abstract
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) for QoL outcome Low risk Not relevant
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All the relevant predefined efficacy outcomes were reported, however, safety outcomes were very limited
Other bias Unclear risk Unable to assess on the published abstract