Makiyama 2018.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Multicentre open‐label phase 2 RCT | |
| Participants | Diagnosis: HER2‐positive advanced unresectable or recurrent G/GEJ cancer Previous treatment status: progression first‐line chemotherapy with trastuzumab + fluoropyrimidine + platinum; ECOG0‐2 Number of participants: 89 enrolled between December 2012 to October 2016 Study locations: 8 centres in Japan Other relevant key eligibility criteria were: ECOG PS 0‐2; expected survival ≥ 90 days; measurable or evaluable lesion, adequate bone marrow and kidney/liver functions; left ventricular Ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% measured by echocardiography or multi‐gated acquisition scan (MUGA) |
|
| Interventions | Arm A (44 participants): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on Day 1, 8, 15 of 28‐day cycle and trastuzumab 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of 21‐day cycle Arm B (45 participants): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on Day 1, 8, 15 of 28‐day cycle |
|
| Outcomes | Primary endpoint: PFS Secondary endpoints: OS, RR, safety and translational biomarker research |
|
| Notes | Only abstract published UMIN000009297 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unable to assess on the published abstract |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unable to assess on the published abstract |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unable to assess on the published abstract |
| Imbalance in baseline characteristics across arms (confounding) | Unclear risk | Unable to assess on the published abstract |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) for outcomes other than QoL | Unclear risk | Unable to assess on the published abstract |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) for QoL outcome | Low risk | Not relevant |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All the relevant predefined efficacy outcomes were reported, however, safety outcomes were very limited |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Unable to assess on the published abstract |