Lund 2020.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomised, controlled trial Recruitment date: September 2012 to May 2013 Treatment arms: 2 Follow‐up: 1 post‐bath measurement |
|
Participants |
Randomisation: N = 100 (vaginal delivery n = 50, caesarean section (C/S) n = 50) (intervention n = 49, control n = 51); randomised according to a balanced block design and stratified according to delivery mode Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | All participants were bathed according to the study protocol: immersion bath with water temperature 101°F, depth 5 inches(12.7 cm), which has been shown to be safe even with the umbilical cord in place and swaddle technique to reduce infant distress. The infant was stabilised under a radiant warmer with the 2 study sites ‐ volar forearm and beneath the sternum ‐ exposed for 10 minutes Intervention: bathed using cleanser Comparator: bathed with water only Cleanser ingredients: Johnson & Johnson's Head‐To‐Toe™ was used, as this product was used at the time at this facility. It is a soap‐free liquid cleanser designed for newborn and infant skin; it is sodium lauryl sulfate‐free and pH‐adjusted |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome: skin barrier function, measured by skin surface pH Secondaryoutcomes: transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hydration of the stratum corneum (SCH) Adverse events: not reported |
|
Identification |
Country: USA Setting: UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA, USA Sponsorship Source: this study was supported by a grant from Johnson & Johnson Consumer Co. Inc., and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF‐CTSI Grant Number UL1 TR000004 |
|
Declarations of interest | This study was supported by a grant from Johnson & Johnson Consumer Co. Inc., and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF‐CTSI Grant Number UL1 TR000004 | |
Notes |