Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;2020(12):CD004349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004349.pub3

PAST‐BP 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, open‐label, controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to an intensive blood pressure target or a standard target. BP was measured by using an automated sphygmomanometer. BP was measured in a standardised way, with the patient seated for five minutes and then six measurements taken at one minute intervals. The reported number was the average of the second and third measurements.
The average follow‐up was 1 year.
Participants 529 patients were considered for inclusion if they were in the practice's TIA/stroke register. They were excluded if their baseline SBP was less than 125 mm Hg, they were already taking three or more antihypertensive agents, they had a greater than 20 mm Hg postural change in SBP on standing, they were already being treated to a 130 mm Hg SBP target. 379 participants were included in the analysis
Interventions Systolic BP targets
Intensive blood pressure target was defined as < 130 mm Hg or a 10 mm Hg reduction if baseline pressure was < 140 mm Hg, whereas standard target was < 130 mm Hg.
Outcomes The primary outcome was change in SBP between baseline and one year. Clinical events were identified through review of the general practice records. They included fatal and non‐fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, or other cardiovascular death, emergency hospital admissions, and deaths.
Notes Funded by the National Institute for Health Research in England
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Blinding of participants and investigators not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Clinical events were identified through review of the general practice records, but they were not evaluated by investigators
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk 16% of patients withdrew from the trial (20% in the intensive target arm and 12% in the standard target arm). Despite that, all patients were followed‐up for clinical events and deaths
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Not all outcomes reported
Other bias High risk A significantly greater number of patients (109 versus 57, P = 0.005) in the intensive target group did not have their BP treatment increased when the BP was above target, mainly due to symptoms attributed to BP drugs and patient not wanting treatment to be intensified