Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Austin 2015 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient was Foley catheter and inpatient IOL was vaginal PGE2. |
Beckmann 2020 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient IOL was balloon catheter and Inpatient IOL was vaginal prostaglandin. |
Henry 2011 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient IOL was intracervical Foley catheter and Inpatient IOL was intravaginal PGE2 gel. |
Kuper 2018 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient IOL was Foley catheter and inpatient IOL was Foley catheter + oxytocin infusion. |
PonMalar 2017 | This study compared vaginal misoprostol with placebo, both groups of women being sent home after induction and normal CTG. So not comparing the different settings. |
Rijnders 2011 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient IOL was amniotomy and Inpatient IOL was at the clinician's discretion so could be: amniotomy, balloon catheter, vaginal prostaglandin. |
Torbenson 2015 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient IOL was with Foley catheter and Inpatient IOL was with either Foley catheter or vaginal prostaglandin. Also this is a preference trial so some women randomised to groups and some chose. |
Wise 2020 | Different method of induction for the 2 arms: outpatient IOL was balloon catheter and Inpatient IOL was vaginal prostaglandin. |
CTG: cardiotocograph IOL: induction of labour PGE2: prostaglandin E2