Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;2020(10):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub3

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES.

Study characteristics
Methods Type of RCT: 1:1 double‐blind, stratified, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group RCT (with run‐in phase)
Settings: outpatient care
Duration: median follow‐up 2.8 years
Start and stop dates: August 2012 and January 2018
Participants Number of participants: 18,924
Number lost to follow‐up: 86
Women: 4762 (25%)
Mean age (SD), years: 59 (9)
History of CVD: 0
Participants with FH: NA
People aged ≥ 40 years had been hospitalised with an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction or unstable angina) 1–12 months before randomisation, and had LDL‐C ≥ 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L), non‐HDL‐C ≥ 100 mg/dL, or ApoB level ≥ 80 mg/dL
Interventions Background therapy: minimum of 2 weeks of stable treatment with atorvastatin 40–80 mg once daily, rosuvastatin 20–40 mg once daily, or maximum tolerated dose of 1 of these statins (including no statin in the case of documented unacceptable adverse effects)
Randomised therapy: alirocumab vs placebo
Alirocumab dose: 75 mg every 2 weeks followed by blinded, lipid‐guided adjustment.
Outcomes  CVD, defined as a composite of: death from CHD, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalisation, and ischaemia‐driven coronary revascularisation
Notes Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Centralised treatment allocation system.
Quote: "the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) and the Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) depending on the choice of the site."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Placebo controlled.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The trial‐group assignments and lipid levels during the trial were concealed from the patients and investigators."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Independent Clinical Events Committee
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk 86/18,924 participants lost to follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported protocol‐defined endpoints.
Other bias Low risk No concerns outside the assessed risk of bias domains.