Summary of findings 6. Antidepressants versus any complementary medicine.
Antidepressants compared with any other intervention for postnatal depression | ||||||
Patient or population: women of any age, with PND up to 12 months Settings: any Intervention: antidepressant (fluoxetine) Comparison: any complementary medicine (saffron) | ||||||
Outcomes | Absolute assumed effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of women (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with any other intervention | Risk with antidepressant | |||||
Depression response (acute phase, 5 ≤ 12 weeks) |
406 per 1000 | 500 per 1000 (288 to 861) | RR 1.23 (0.71 to 2.12) | 64 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝a,b,c Very low |
Depression response defined as ≥ 50% decrease in HAM‐D |
Depression remission (acute phase, 5 ≤ 12 weeks) |
188 per 1000 |
219 per 1000 (83 to 579) |
RR 1.17 (0.44 to 3.09) | 64 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝a,b,c Very low |
Depression remission defined as score ≤ 7 HAM‐D |
Adverse events | Frequencies of adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups. No major adverse event and no death occurred | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Depression severity | See comment | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No study reported this outcome | |
Treatment acceptability | See comment | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No study reported this outcome | |
Child‐related outcomes | See comment | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No study reported this outcome | |
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; HAM‐D: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; PND: postnatal depression; RR: risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
aDowngraded one level for high risk of attrition and reporting bias. bDowngraded one level for imprecision as the number of participants is less than 400. cDowngraded one level for imprecision as the confidence interval includes no effect and appreciable harm.