Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 13;2021(2):CD013560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013560.pub2

Summary of findings 6. Antidepressants versus any complementary medicine.

Antidepressants compared with any other intervention for postnatal depression
Patient or population: women of any age, with PND up to 12 months
Settings: any
Intervention: antidepressant (fluoxetine)
Comparison: any complementary medicine (saffron)
Outcomes Absolute assumed effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of women
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with any other intervention Risk with antidepressant
Depression response
(acute phase, 5 ≤ 12 weeks)
406 per 1000 500 per 1000 (288 to 861) RR 1.23 (0.71 to 2.12) 64 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝a,b,c
Very low
Depression response defined as 50% decrease in HAM‐D
Depression remission
(acute phase, 5 ≤ 12 weeks)
188 per 1000 219 per 1000
(83 to 579)
RR 1.17 (0.44 to 3.09) 64 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝a,b,c
Very low
Depression remission defined as score ≤ 7 HAM‐D
Adverse events Frequencies of adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups. No major adverse event and no death occurred
Depression severity See comment No study reported this outcome
Treatment acceptability See comment No study reported this outcome
Child‐related outcomes See comment No study reported this outcome
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; HAM‐D: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; PND: postnatal depression; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level for high risk of attrition and reporting bias.
bDowngraded one level for imprecision as the number of participants is less than 400.
cDowngraded one level for imprecision as the confidence interval includes no effect and appreciable harm.