Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;2020(11):CD003229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003229.pub4

Burnand 1989.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled
Method of randomisation: not stated
Exclusions post randomisation: none
Losses to follow‐up: none
Participants Country: UK
Setting: hospital
Number: 49 patients
Age: mean 53 years
Gender: 18 M:31 F
Inclusion criteria: venous reflux by volumetry, with varicose veins and lipodermatosclerosis
Exclusion criteria: patients with ankle‐to‐arm arterial Doppler pressure ratio < 1.0 (significant arterial disease)
Interventions Treatment: oxerutin (Paroven) 500 mg per 12 hours
Control: placebo
Duration: 30 days
Follow‐up: 30 days
Outcomes Primary
  • Signs ‐ oedema (foot volumes) measured by water displacement, transcutaneous oximetry (TCPO2)


Secondary
  • Not stated

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "A double‐blind controlled trial was undertaken.." and "the two groups of patients were balanced and randomized by trial number so that as far as possible an equal number in each group..."
Comment: no details of randomisation method provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no methods of allocation concealment described
Blinding (patients) Low risk Quote: "Were given Paroven 500 mg bd or identical placebo"
Comment: Identical placebo ensures double‐blinding
Blinding (study researchers) Low risk Quote: "Were given Paroven 500 mg bd or identical placebo"
Comment: Identical placebo ensures double‐blinding
Blinding (outcome assessment) Low risk Quote: "This code was not broken until the completion of the study"
Comment: outcome assessors blinded
Incomplete outcome data Low risk Comment: neither exclusions post randomisation nor losses to follow‐up described
Selective reporting Low risk Comment: no published protocol identified, and no differences between outcomes reported in the methods section and those reported in the results section
Other bias Low risk Comment: none detected