Kriner 1985.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled Method of randomisation: not stated Exclusions post randomisation: not stated Losses to follow‐up: not stated |
|
Participants | Country: Germany Setting: hospital Number: 50 patients Age: 'adults' Gender: not stated Inclusion criteria: disturbances of venous blood flow, oedema Exclusion criteria: not stated |
|
Interventions | Treatment: ruscus extract 75 mg and hesperidin 75 mg 2 × 2 capsules per day. rutoside cream once per day Control: placebo Duration: 28 days Follow‐up: 28 days |
|
Outcomes | Primary
Secondary
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "The two groups were balanced and comparable with respect to age, weight, and type and duration of disturbances" Comment: no method of randomisation described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no method of allocation concealment described |
Blinding (patients) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information given about methods used for blinding |
Blinding (study researchers) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information given about methods used for blinding |
Blinding (outcome assessment) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information given about methods used for blinding |
Incomplete outcome data | Unclear risk | Comment: number in each group described, but important characteristics lacking. In addition, number of participants who dropped out prematurely or were excluded after randomisation not described |
Selective reporting | Low risk | Comment: no published protocol identified, and no differences between outcomes reported in the methods section and those reported in the results section |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: none detected |