MacLennan 1994.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: multicenter, international, parallel, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial Method of randomisation: not stated Exclusions post randomisation: none Losses to follow‐up: 16/104 (15%) |
|
Participants | Country: UK, Germany, Netherland and Belgium Setting: hospital Number: 104 patients Age: ≥ 65 years Gender: 24 M:62 F Inclusion criteria: unilateral or bilateral symptoms and signs of CVI. Compression stockings allowed Exclusion criteria: bed‐bound or with cardiac or renal or hepatic disease or clinically important obesity; arterial insufficiency of the legs |
|
Interventions | Treatment
Follow‐up: 180 days Participants who wore elastic support stockings had to continue to wear them throughout the study |
|
Outcomes | Primary
Secondary
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomization was made according to a computer‐generated randomization list in blocks of 10" Comment: computer‐generated randomisation list generally accepted as an appropriate way to generate a random sequence of participants |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no method of allocation concealment stated |
Blinding (patients) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients from each centre in the randomised control group were given placebo capsules identical in appearance" Comment: Identical placebo ensures double‐blinding |
Blinding (study researchers) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients from each centre in the randomised control group were given placebo capsules identical in appearance" Comment: Identical placebo ensures double‐blinding |
Blinding (outcome assessment) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients from each centre in the randomised control group were given placebo capsules identical in appearance" Comment: Identical placebo ensures double‐blinding |
Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | Comment: number of participants described, along with the most important characteristics, number of drop‐outs, adverse events and information on compliance |
Selective reporting | Low risk | Comment: no published protocol identified, and no differences between outcomes reported in the methods section and those reported in the results section |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: none detected |