Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;2020(11):CD003229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003229.pub4

NCT01848210.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled
Method of randomisation: "by chance, like flipping a coin"
Exclusions post randomisation: 166
Losses to follow‐up: 36
Participants Country: Brazil
Setting: not specified
Number: 829 (411 experimental group and 418 placebo group) included and 711 analysed (383 experimental group and 388 placebo group)
Age (mean): 56 (18 to 75 years old)
Gender: 83 men and 688 women
Inclusion criteria: consent of subject or legal representative. Men or women of any ethnicity, aged between 18 and 75 years, and BMI equal or less than 40. CVI in the reference leg with the clinical classification C3, or C4a or C4b or C5, stable edema. Scoring in "Severity Score of Local Complaints" equal to or higher than 5 total points. Women who are using an effective birth control or who are postmenopausal
Exclusion criteria: Deep vein insufficiency or venous obstruction and/or DVT and/or presence of phlebitis in lower limbs during the last 3 months.Surgery at the venous system or sclerotherapy or any treatment for CVI during the last 3 months. History of known or suspected allergy or intolerance to any of the ingredients of the medicinal product under investigation. Serious systemic disease. Hepatitis A, hepatitis B, or C or any liver disease. Use of diuretics. Diabetes insulin‐dependent. History of alcoholism, drug abuse, psychological or emotional problems
Interventions Treatment: Coumarin 30 mg, troxerutin 180 mg fixed‐dose combination tablets (Venalot), orally, 3 times daily
Control: placebo
Duration: 16 weeks
Follow‐up: 18 weeks
Outcomes Primary:
  • Mean change from baseline in volume of reference leg at week 16 using a water plethysmometer


Secondary:
  • Change from baseline in local complaint severity (eight symptoms assessed by a lickert scale)

  • Overal assessment by the investigator

  • Number of participants with adverse events

Notes Sponsor: Takeda. Results published in clinicaltrials.gov
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: not specified.
Blinding (patients) Low risk Quote: "Placebo (dummy inactive pill) ‐ this is a tablet that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient. All participants will be asked to take two tablets three times a day throughout the study"
Blinding (study researchers) Low risk Quote: "Placebo (dummy inactive pill) ‐ this is a tablet that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient. All participants will be asked to take two tablets three times a day throughout the study"
Blinding (outcome assessment) Low risk Quote: "Placebo (dummy inactive pill) ‐ this is a tablet that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient. All participants will be asked to take two tablets three times a day throughout the study"
Incomplete outcome data Low risk Comment: there was a IIT analysis (patient that taken the treatment at least 28 days) and a PP analysis. The total losses were 166 (20%)
Selective reporting Low risk Comment: all results are published.
Other bias Low risk Comment: none detected